There was a debate not so long ago about some kind of software distribution license scheme. Of course, this would never work - it would hinder good but unfunded programs from getting onto the market, and it would only serve to increase the power of the people with money on their hands. But, there is also something to be said about the positive aspects of this idea. Many problems we face in our every day computer using is caused by ill defined and poorly implemented programs that consumes too many resources. Lets face it: controling for memory leaks takes time and is not as exciting as creating an application which fixes a problem.
I would think that a majority of the problems we see everyday, and think is a bug in the underlying OS, is caused by programs not behaving nicelly. That's why I think that the Apple Store policy of a review process before accepting an application into the iPhones is a very good idea. A program which misbehaves will make the iPhone appear to be a poor device, and that damages the brand name Apple now spent lots of money to create. And they have been successful. So, provided that the policy is aimed at ensuring quality, and not the diversity of content or services, then this policy is something I applaud.
I just wish the same policy could be applied to the OS X platform. In the spirit of making sure that we realise that money is no guarantee of ability to provide quality, I now officially declare Word 2008 for Mac to be a program which should really be pulled from the market. Let's face it, it is FAR from stable. It's been out now for two years, so this is not the initial unpatched version, and you can still easilly crash it doing one of the following (apparently) high-risk maneuvers:
In my view, Microsoft should really spend less money on advertisement and just get a product that strengthens their credability. It is not sufficient to say that the developing in a cross-platform way is too difficult. OpenOffice does it, and even though I have to say that is a bit "heavier", it is much, much more stable. So often now, I switch back to OpenOffice to do the editing of a document, and then re-save in the final step in Word in order to ensure complete compatibility with word (usually the Mendeley codes), before sending it to collegues. I'm basically using OpenOffice to fix Word's bugs. This, when I am not busy sending bug reports to Microsoft... I just think someone over there should try to use their products before they ship them. Just changing something in the visual representation of a program does not mean that you have created something that should be made into a new release, fixing real problems in the product is!
I would think that a majority of the problems we see everyday, and think is a bug in the underlying OS, is caused by programs not behaving nicelly. That's why I think that the Apple Store policy of a review process before accepting an application into the iPhones is a very good idea. A program which misbehaves will make the iPhone appear to be a poor device, and that damages the brand name Apple now spent lots of money to create. And they have been successful. So, provided that the policy is aimed at ensuring quality, and not the diversity of content or services, then this policy is something I applaud.
I just wish the same policy could be applied to the OS X platform. In the spirit of making sure that we realise that money is no guarantee of ability to provide quality, I now officially declare Word 2008 for Mac to be a program which should really be pulled from the market. Let's face it, it is FAR from stable. It's been out now for two years, so this is not the initial unpatched version, and you can still easilly crash it doing one of the following (apparently) high-risk maneuvers:
- Insert a note into a document.
- Erase a comma in a note.
- Try to save the document while editing a note.
In my view, Microsoft should really spend less money on advertisement and just get a product that strengthens their credability. It is not sufficient to say that the developing in a cross-platform way is too difficult. OpenOffice does it, and even though I have to say that is a bit "heavier", it is much, much more stable. So often now, I switch back to OpenOffice to do the editing of a document, and then re-save in the final step in Word in order to ensure complete compatibility with word (usually the Mendeley codes), before sending it to collegues. I'm basically using OpenOffice to fix Word's bugs. This, when I am not busy sending bug reports to Microsoft... I just think someone over there should try to use their products before they ship them. Just changing something in the visual representation of a program does not mean that you have created something that should be made into a new release, fixing real problems in the product is!
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar